Huge China coal plant shelved over pollution concerns

Yesterday news broke that Chinese authorities scrapped a huge proposed coal plant over environment and air pollution concerns. No need to do a double take, it’s true. The world’s largest coal consumer, home to a potential coal bubble, just shelved an enormous coal project over pollution concerns. This news comes just days after headlines screamed that coal use is up 50 percent globally. It looks like our Chinese friends responded by underscoring that local communities fed up with dealing with the deadly pollution can, when provoked, be an even more powerful force than the coal industry.

First, let’s put this in perspective. In Europe or the U.S., a huge 2,000-megawatt coal power project (roughly the size of four average U.S. coal plants) next to a megacity of 10 million, would top the list of polluting power plant proposals and attract intense scrutiny. In China, which has continued to add an equivalent amount of capacity every few weeks, permitting a project like this half a year ago was still business as usual. It’s what happened after the projects preparatory work got underway that bent the arc of history in China.

The 2,000-megawatt power plant was planned on the coast of South China Sea, 50 kilometers from the megacities of Shenzhen, population 10 million, and Hong Kong, population 7 million. Greenpeace estimated that the new power plant would cause 1,700 premature deaths over its operating life, despite being fitted with state-of-the-art SO2, NOx and particulate filters.

With the terrible air pollution in the Pearl River Delta region around Hong Kong drawing increasing public ire, and recent air pollution episodes still fresh in people’s memory, the project faced a thunderstorm of public opinion. Remember this is a public that has woken up to the damage coal causes by living through ‘Airpocalypse.’ They are now recognizing that coal-burning is the main cause of China’s severe air pollution problem and they’re not happy about it.

Following criticism in social media and traditional media, 43 members of the city’s People’s Congress petitioned the administration to cancel the project and not to allow the construction of any new coal-fired power plant anywhere within the city’s borders. The administration reacted only a few weeks later, asking the power company to stop the power plant construction. And just like that, local citizens halted an enormous coal plant.

What makes this case unique is that while power plants and other industrial projects regularly face opposition because of land and water issues, this is the first project that has been cancelled mainly on the basis of concerns about air pollution. China has made astonishing progress in installing filters in its massive coal-fired power plant fleet. However, what has been gained through improvements in end-of-pipe controls has been offset by the doubling of coal burning over the past decade. The gains from new air pollution regulation being squandered by expansion of coal burning was a key argument against the power plant project in Shenzhen. Nearby Guangdong still has a large pipeline of new coal-fired power plant projects, but the public concern on air pollution and pressure to stem coal use will make these increasingly unlikely to be implemented now as well.

There is increasing recognition that the air pollution crisis cannot be solved without putting brakes on coal consumption. For Chinese citizens — for citizens around the world for that matter — that news, and the steps average citizens are taking because of it, is really, really good. Take a moment and let it sink in. When we look back this may well be a watershed moment in our efforts to address air pollution and finally turn the tide in the fight against climate change.

Justin Guay is Washington Representative of the Sierra Club. The story is co-authored by Lauri Myllyvirta, Greenpeace International. This article was originally published on Huffington Post’s Green blog. Reproduced with permission of the author.

Comments

3 responses to “Huge China coal plant shelved over pollution concerns”

  1. Coaltopia Avatar
    Coaltopia

    Great news -with China’s heat-wave, and a 8% clime in demand, there’ll be pressure to find more power – which is hopefully not coal elsewhere or more dubious mega-dams: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2013/aug/10/china-india-water-grab-dams-himalayas-danger

    – ref http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-13/dozens-die-in-asia-heat-wave-as-power-supply-strained-to-limits.html

  2. mechanieker Avatar
    mechanieker

    “First, let’s put this in perspective. In Europe or the U.S., a huge 2,000-megawatt coal power project (roughly the size of four average U.S. coal plants) next to a megacity of 10 million, would top the list of polluting power plant proposals and attract intense scrutiny.”

    Actually, Germany is currently commissioning 4000 Megawatts of new coal power plants, and this is not topping any lists. It is not being even mentioned by Greenpeace, and it is not in the news. The only way to find out about it is to look for this news yourself, by surfing the internet:

    “Five new coal-fired power plants in Germany with a combined capacity of around 4 GW have had their “first fire” over recent weeks and will be generating electricity in the hot testing phase over the next couple of months, according to a Platts survey of the five plant operators. The projects include RWE’s Hamm D unit (800 MW), EnBW’s RDK 8 (912 MW), Vattenfall’s first block at Hamburg-Moorburg (840 MW), Steag’s Walsum 10 unit (725 MW) and GDF Suez’s new coal-fired power plant at Wilhelmshaven (800 MW).”
    http://www.platts.com/latest-news/coal/london/analysis-german-4-gw-new-coal-plants-in-testing-26170384

    While China is often reported to be the main problem due to its massive coal power plant building spree of the last few decades, the real problem is not that such underdeveloped countries are building coal power plants. The real problem is that rich, developed nations like Germany are building huge amounts of coal plants. The reason this is not being addressed by groups like Greenpeace is that Germany has bought itself a licence to go all-out building new fossil power plants, because they have greenwashed their activities by overhyping their small build-out of solar and wind power plants. Greenpeace does not dare criticise the German fossil fuel spree, because it would contradict Greenpeace’s hyping of Germany as a “champion of sustainability”.

    No need to look for fossil fuel problems in China. The problems are very close to home: in Germany, the heart of the so-called “energiewende”, which is little more than a renewed fossil fuel spree hidden behind a show of token solar and wind projects. The current German planned coal projects will give Germany more coal power capacity in 2030 than it has today, and it has already agreed with Russia to double it’s import capacity of natural gas.

    The so-called “Energiewende” is mere hypocrisy. Germany is and will remain a fossil fueled nation, making no progress in co2 reduction since 2000 when it’s electricity supply was more than 30% co2 free. It’s current target of co2 free electricity for 2022 is the same as it already achieved in 2000. Therefore: Germany is making no progress in reducing the co2 intensity of it’s electricity supply, which is understandable for a nation that is scrapping it’s nuclear power capability.

    1. Giles Avatar
      Giles

      You are tiresome. Always cherry picking information, conveniently omitting to say that the new coal-fired generators and most have been in planning for years and will be outweighed 3:1 by closures.
      From Goldman Sachs: “In Europe, the construction of new coal-fired plants
      continues with approximately 10GW of new capacity to be added in the next 3 years, mainly in Germany and the Netherlands, and partly in response to the early decommissioning of nuclear plants. However, these additions must be set against the retirement of up to 30GW of older power plants that are no longer competitive under tighter emissions regulations.

Get up to 3 quotes from pre-vetted solar (and battery) installers.