Embrace Disruption in Higher Education: Gavin Newsom

SAN FRANCISCO – Gavin Newsom’s staff didn’t want him to give this talk.

How would it look, they feared, if California’s lieutenant governor – someone who sits on the boards of the University of California and California State University systems – appeared on stage with the CEO of a controversial start-up working to upend college education?

He did it anyway.

“This is code red,” Newsom said at TechCrunch’s Disrupt conference this week, speaking in no uncertain terms about how he feels about the state of higher education. “We have to do something dramatic.”

What exactly that means, of course, is still anyone’s guess. But Newsom agreed to debate it with Sebastian Thrun, the co-founder of Udacity, a company that creates online college courses focused largely on science and technology.

The future of college is the topic du jour in this back-to-school season. Amid fears of rising tuition costs and declining state funding is the concern that colleges are simply not preparing students well enough for the working world.

Newsom said institutions had to change their approach to meet the needs of companies like Google, Twitter, Salesforce.com and others – or risk becoming irrelevant.

"It reminds me a bit of Kodak," Newsom said on stage. "You have to wake up before the world that you've created is competing against you."

Thrun went even further, saying that colleges had graduated far too many liberal arts majors and not enough with computer science degrees or programming skills. “Very few of the companies are saying we need more psychologists or English majors,” Thrun said. “They’ll come to me and say, look, ‘Give us tech.’”

On Monday, he announced that his company had launched a program called the Open Education Alliance, a partnership between Udacity, Georgia Tech and employers like Google, Autodesk, Intuit, AT&T, Nvidia and others. The goal is to work with employers to design a curriculum that will help students pursue technology careers.

This sort of specialized training is controversial, of course.

Some college professors, like Swarthmore College's Barry Schwartz, argue that higher education should exist to expose students to many different forms of thinking. That kind of education -- focused on learning, not job-related skills -- is unique to the U.S., he says.

“I don’t think that colleges and universities have done a very good job of defending themselves from assault and resisting the pressure to produce ‘practical’ results, understood as high-paying jobs,” he wrote last week. “If they don’t do a better job, higher education in the U.S. as we have known it will disappear.”

California, for its part, has aggressively pushed state universities to do more with online education. Udacity partnered with San Jose State University in January to teach remedial math courses to students. But the much-touted program has had mixed results. After two semesters, and low pass rates, San Jose State University administrators put the pilot program on hold in the fall so changes could be made to the curriculum.

Newsom said that, "like anything new, there's going to be setbacks." But he praised Udacity for helping to change how students learn. Students who want to re-watch a lecture can now do so on their own time, for example, making it easier for them to absorb the material.

"It's not mass education anymore," he said. "It's personalized."

In an interview with LinkedIn after the TechCrunch discussion, Newsom spoke more about the future of higher education, and whether students need a bachelor's degree. Highlights:

On how higher education fits into the technology revolution:

"Technology has radically leveled a lot of top-down, hierarchal institutions. The industrial economy that served us extraordinarily well for a century is now running out of gas. You've seen it in media; nobody predicted a guy named Craig would come along [and start Craigslist]. We've seen it in publishing. You've seen it, certainly, in the financial service industry. You're seeing it in transportation and every sector of the economy. We haven't seen the radical impact of technology on education yet."

On how universities could work with Massively Open Online Courses (MOOCs):

"The university, the campus setting, is incredibly important. But it's about a hybrid," Newsom says. He can foresee a scenario where students take large, introductory courses at MOOCs -- say, English 101 -- before progressing to higher-level courses on campus.

On whether a bachelor's degree is still worth it:

"In some cases, it's not. In fact, in the vast majority of cases, it probably isn't. I'm an employer: I've got just shy of 800 people that I employ in 17 businesses. I kid you not, maybe I shouldn't acknowledge this, I could care less, with all due respect, where you graduated. I care about your experience, and I care about whatever the technical skills [you have]."

Photo: Getty Images Entertainment

Tim Murphy

Care Management and Qualified Professional, specializing in work with special populations.

10y

This is a great philosophy if all you need are drones who can do a specialized task. Somewhere down the line, a few of these high performers will need to make a critical business decision or step up to management. The skills they gain in Higher Education will equip them appropriately.

Like
Reply

Think about it... Could be a solution? This article aims to present the Logistics Learning (2L’s) - the new set of rules to be applied in the education process along a teaching period. The methodology named is Cyclical Assessment Logistics Learning - CALL, which is monitored by using a specific technology for the education management integrated to the learning process. "There is no education crisis in Brazil or anywhere in the world. What there is a deplorable absence of true education." (H. Hohden, 2001) The Logistics Learning is based in the Psychology, Logistic and Administration knowledge areas to offer a contribution of qualimetry assessment process beyond as usually we applied, just by simple scores. This design conception intends to integrate the learning process at the world of business through social media to producing a new educational culture suits corporate trends. Purposes? The human learn capacity can’t be evaluated by simple scores, but rather as assessed beyond an integrated system that respects the skills complexity of each one as individual. The project scope aims to improve the learning process with a new methodology evaluation in educational institutions... As this is a breakthrough technique which offers a special kind flexibilization of learning environment benefits in the transmission of knowledge. It comes to facilitate the communication among teacher, student and the job market to gaze upon the mission to improve our intellectual and scientific culture in the academic environment and professional vocation...The learning process is solved by the integrated management system, which measures the resourcefulness of education qualitative and quantitatively through cognitive, affective and psychomotor factors just for one simple reason: keeping the student motivated to research, open reason to create scientific works over a school period. According to the CALL methodology, this procedure encourages from an early age the apprentices thoughts to developing culture projects, besides providing the discovery of a native talent to be expand precociously and orientate these skills with effectiveness in the labor market sponsored. Justifying the project? The Education should not be evaluated superficially only from the level of instruction. "Education is like the ocean, where beneath the water surface exists a tremendous variety of life happening." (R. Mello, 2007) Does we have a duty to rescue this immense knowledge in the depths of the ocean to take it to the new ages of clouds technology?

Like
Reply
M. Frank Johnson

11x HubSpot Certified - Pro & Enterprise • 100% Remote Since 2011

10y

Blah ... blah ... blah ... More bs by the education status quo whose real mission is to 'disrupt' nothing more than less expensive and effective online models, (available for well over a decade), until they figure out how to fully monetize these for themselves. I guess I shouldn't be so hard on conventional higher education evangelists - they have a right to earn a living as well. I just have a serious problem with them earning that living, in many cases, off the backs of the socioeconomically challenged, and at the expense of tax payers who end up underwriting all those grants and subsidised loans for seriously overpriced programs with relatively poor outcomes. Charging >$60K for an MBA or >$100 for a law degree and not being able to find decent jobs for significant numbers of their graduates puts them in the same league as Madoff as far as I'm concerned. Pick your state, pick your college, pick your scam ... I only hope ideas that help quell the relentless pursuit of money by these 'higher' education institutions come out of these discussions (doubtful). Too much at stake. That said, unless and until, as parents and as a nation, we INSIST on getting more bang for our educational bucks in the form of JOBS ... we will continue down the same low ROI path we've been on for more decades to come. Sad, but true.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics